Seventeen Measures Get Perdue Veto,
Fewer Than Last Year
(5/15/08) The veto pen wasn't quite as heavy this year as last
year, when he nixed some 41 blls - the highest number in more than
a dozen years. But Gov. Sonny Perdue still found reason to veto
17 bills while signing 430 others.
Among those vetoed were a pay raise for the courts and a measure
allowing law enforcement officers to impound the vehicles of those
found driving without a valid license.
Here's the list and his veto messages:
House Bill 119
House Bill 119 raises the statutory compensation for Georgia’s
Supreme Court justices, Court of Appeals and Superior Court judges
and District Attorneys. I have consistently expressed concern with
raising judicial officers’ salaries without tackling the well
above-market retirement benefits. In addition, I commissioned a
review of judicial pay in Georgia and found it in line with competitor
states and various counsel. The same review also confirmed that
the judiciary’s retirement benefits are far above market average.
I have seen no compelling data to the contrary. I disagree with
those who have suggested that current judicial pay has diminished
the quality of applicants for judicial office. Contrary to such
critics, I continue to be impressed with the quality and character
of those who offer themselves for public service in the State judiciary.
I have full confidence in the abilities of those I have appointed
to the bench as well as many of the candidates I have interviewed.
These facts lead me to conclude that no data demonstrates a need
to raise judicial compensation at this time, so I VETO House Bill
119.
(Chief Justice Leah Sears responded shortly
afterwards: “I am dismayed and deeply disappointed with the
Governor’s veto. Our judges have not had a pay raise in nearly
a decade, other than an occasional cost of living adjustment. I
am grateful to all those who tried to help correct this injustice,
including former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn, Lt. Gov. Cagle, Speaker
Richardson, the state Senate, the House of Representatives, the
Georgia Chamber of Commerce, the State Bar of Georgia, and many
others. I hope that Governor Perdue will find a way to join this
groundswell and work with us before – not in the middle of
– the next legislative session to fix this urgent problem.”
)
House Bill 373
House Bill 373 addresses two unrelated retirement issues: return
to work and the transfer of credible service between retirement
systems. The bill would allow retired members of the Uniformed Division
of the Department of Public Safety to return to work full time,
which runs counter to the purpose of retirement benefits and the
choices made by those members who decided to retire. Whatever perceived
ills this legislation seeks to address should be assuaged by my
budget recommendation that includes funding for personnel at the
Department. Thus, the fiscal and policy concerns I have about this
legislation require me to VETO House Bill 373.
House Bill 887
House Bill 887 creates a Master Settlement Agreement Advisory Committee
on Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Programs within the Department
of Human Resources. It is my view that the Advisory Committee duplicates
the duties of the Executive and the Legislative branches in representing
the voices of Georgians. I am not convinced that that various groups
named to the Committee lack access to Georgia’s policy makers.
I am also concerned that other groups might have been inadvertently
omitted or overlooked. I am confident that my Administration and
the General Assembly remain open to input from all Georgians on
this issue. Consequently, I VETO House Bill 887.
House Bill 978
House Bill 978 requires that law enforcement officers impound the
vehicle of any person caught driving without a valid driver’s
license. While it does provide three exceptions – (1) persons
driving with an expired license; (2) first-time offenders that are
under 17 years of age; and (3) persons otherwise exempt from carrying
a Georgia drivers’ license – it mandates impoundment
in all other circumstances. To help address what I believe to be
the concerns of this legislation’s author, I have already
signed Senate Bill 350, which enhances the penalties for driving
without a valid drivers’ license. However, because I believe
that officers should have discretion to determine when a vehicle
should be impounded, and because I am concerned about how this legislation
will impact new residents to Georgia, I cannot sign House Bill 978.
I therefore VETO House Bill 978.
House Bill 1027
House Bill 1027 would allow certain offenders to take online driver
improvement programs. It maintains a fee of $75.00 for classroom
courses and Internet-based programs through May 31, 2008; subsequently,
both online and classroom courses may charge no more than $75.00.
I believe that the delivery of online classes should be less expensive
than classroom courses, which is not wholly reflected in House Bill
1027. More importantly, I have serious concerns about the integrity
of a punishment that permits habitual violators of Georgia’s
traffic laws to take online courses. For these reasons, I VETO House
Bill 1027.
House Bill 1116
House Bill 1116 extends the sunset on the Probation Management Act.
It also raises the statutory minimum amount that the State Treasury
must reimburse county governments for housing persons convicted
of felonies from $7.50 to $25.00, an over 333% increase, per day
commencing on the fifteenth day after receipt of sentencing documents.
The latter provision will not be effective until 2010. I support
the extension of the Probation Management Act, but I believe decisions
about compensation for counties should be made in the budget not
statute. Accordingly, I VETO House Bill 1116.
House Bill 1129
House Bill 1129 provides sales tax refunds for certain tourism related
projects. Anytime the State uses public funds to subsidize companies
locating or expanding in Georgia, we have an obligation to insure
that the economic development returns exceed the investment. To
these ends, I have charged the Department of Economic Development
to use prudently the incentives available under existing law to
attract tourism companies to locate in Georgia. Given these principles,
I am not persuaded that the fiscal costs of this legislation outweigh
the potential benefits. First, the case has not been made that companies’
decisions to locate tourism attractions are based on tax incentives
rather than traffic, demographics and other objective factors. Georgia
will, therefore, likely not achieve the full benefit of net new
jobs that are expected from this legislation. Second, imposing an
incentive structure like the one in House Bill 1129 could result
in excessive application, and it could create a perceived entitlement
for new and existing Georgia companies. Put differently, codifying
potential tourism incentives sets a floor in negotiations, and I
believe it raises the expectation for additional incentives. It
is preferable to handle each project on a case-by-case basis, which
may include – with the approval of the General Assembly –
some of the types of incentives provided in House Bill 1129. Given
these concerns, I cannot support and therefore VETO House Bill 1129.
House Bill 1217
House Bill 1217 provides a regime to license Georgia’s home
inspectors. I am cognizant and respectful of the fact that the advocates
for the legislation chose to use and were approved by the Georgia
Occupational Regulation Review Council (GORRC). I have come to believe
that GORRC review should be the initial threshold for the creation
of a new licensing board. I am also aware that the private sector
provides several, voluntary professional organizations to achieve
the goals of the legislation. It is my preference that the market
– not the State – regulate as many of our industries
as possible. Thus, in order to not supplant the good work of the
free market with taxpayer funds, I VETO House Bill 1217.
House Bill 1249
House Bill 1249 provides several new tax credits related to solar
energy companies establishing or expanding a headquarters in Georgia.
I support the location and expansion of clean energy companies in
Georgia, but the precedent set by this legislation is too costly
to be applied across the board. Specifically, House Bill 1249 provides
overly generous tax subsidies for (1) research and development;
(2) jobs; and (3) capital construction. It allows the tax credits
to be offset against withholding or sales and use taxes owed to
the extent the beneficiary’s tax credit exceed its taxable
income. The cost of this legislation – that currently benefits
only one company in Georgia – is over $4 million in State
revenue. Because of my concern that this rich package will be the
perceived standard for similar industries in Georgia, I am compelled
to VETO House Bill 1249.
Senate Bill 196
Senate Bill 196, like House Bill 311, expands on the HERO scholarship
program. I have already expanded the reach of the HERO program by
signing House Bill 311. The differences between this legislation
and the existing and expanded program make it difficult to administer.
Beyond this, the General Assembly appropriated no funds to implement
Senate Bill 196. For these reasons, I VETO Senate Bill 196.
Senate Bill 345
Senate Bill 345 mandates Georgia’s participation in the Interstate
Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children, which
would assess unspecified fees on Georgia to be appropriated by the
General Assembly. Should the General Assembly fail to appropriate
the undetermined amount, the proposed compact would subject the
State of Georgia to a lawsuit to recover funds. I cannot support
a self-perpetuating financial obligation imposed on Georgia tax
payers. I fully support efforts to enhance the quality of life for
children of military families stationed in Georgia, and I encourage
the Department of Education to adopt policies to reach these ends.
I believe, however, that the proposed compact represents an abdication
and unconstitutional binding of the Legislature’s powers of
appropriation. I therefore VETO Senate Bill 345.
Senate Resolution 820
Senate Resolution 820 creates a Joint Study Committee to examine
law enforcement within the Department of Natural Resources. The
stated objective of the Study Committee is to “undertake a
study of the conditions, needs, issues, and problems” facing
the Department of Natural Resources, but the proposed study committee
fails to include any representation from the Executive Branch. It
is my belief that formal examinations of an Executive Agency should
include representatives from the Executive Branch of government.
For this reason, I VETO Senate Resolution 820.
House Bill 552
House Bill 552 authorizes the City of Snellville to act in a manner
consistent with the Redevelopment Powers Act. At the request of
the sponsors, I VETO House Bill 552 as duplicative of House Bill
1261.
House Bill 821
House Bill 821 changes the compensation for the Office of Cobb County
Solicitor-General. At the request of the authors, I VETO HB 821.
House Bill 828
House Bill 828 would move Banks County from the Lanier Technical
College service delivery area to the North Georgia Technical College
service delivery area. It is my understanding that this legislation
circumvented the normal process for making such a change: consulting
the Department of Technical and Adult Education, now known as the
Technical College System of Georgia. In order to allow the System
to best plan for Georgia’s students through discussions with
the legislative branch, I VETO House Bill 828.
House Bill 857
House Bill 857 increases the salary for the Sheriff of Washington
County. Last year I vetoed legislation passed under similar circumstances,
explaining that “The County Commission was not consulted before
this legislation was introduced, but the County Commission must
provide for the unfunded mandate contained in [the vetoed legislation]
through taxpayer funded general revenue. I do not support unfunded
mandates generally, especially when local governing authorities
did not have the benefit of consultation prior to the Legislative
Session.” For identical reasons, I VETO House Bill 857.
Senate Bill 553
Senate Bill 553 changes the corporate limits of the City of Ringold.
At the request of a member of the local delegation, I VETO Senate
Bill 553 to allow the parties time to resolve the matter without
State intervention.
|