NRA Hasn't Weighed-In Yet On Bearden
Bill, But National Gun Group Won't Like It
By Dick Pettys
InsiderAdvantage Georgia
(1/3/07) The NRA hasn’t
weighed-in yet, but it looks like we’re going to have a shootout
at the Georgia General Assembly this year over two competing gun
bills.
We’ve told you previously about the NRA’s main bill
– the parking lot guns bill which would prohibit employers
from taking steps to bar their workers from having guns in cars
parked at the workplace. The bill was introduced last year and was
blocked by a strong coalition of business groups arguing that it
would violate private property rights. The measure remains alive
this year, however, and remains the NRA’s top priority.
We’ve also told you about a rival proposal by Rep. Tim Bearden,
R-Villa Rica, and a group called GeorgiaCarry.org,
which does a number of other things. Among them: Mayor Bloomberg
would face criminal penalties for sending undercover agents to Georgia
to try to get gun shops to sell to “straw purchasers,”
the government couldn’t seize weapons as Louisiana authorities
sought to do after Hurricane Katrina, and Georgia’s carry
laws would be substantially overhauled.
One link between them is procedural. Last year, Bearden passed
a much less complicated bill through the House intended to give
people more latitude in carrying guns in their autos. In the Senate,
it became a vehicle for the NRA to bring its parking lot bill back
to life after the original proposal ran afoul of a Senate deadline.
The omnibus bill - now HB
89 - did not reach a vote on the Senate floor.
But there’s more. Some of the GeorgiaCarry folks think the
NRA is out of step with what Georgia sportsmen and shooters want,
and is putting forward its plan as a counter-measure. (It does,
however, contain some things the NRA wants and has supported in
other states, and some of the backers don’t view the upcoming
fight so much as a confrontation with the NRA as a simple disagreement
among advocates of gun rights.)
Now for the meat in the cocoanut. Bearden’s bill –
prefiled last week as HB
915 – contains this language:
"Nothing in this Code section shall be construed to limit,
restrict, or prohibit in any manner the existing rights of a private
property owner, unless such private property has been leased to
a government entity, and nothing in this Code section shall be construed
to limit, restrict, or prohibit in any manner the existing rights
of a private tenant, private employer, or private business entity."
That, according to those who have looked at the law carefully,
makes the NRA’s guns-in-the-parking-lot effort moot, and,
at the proper time, you can bet the national gun group will weigh-in
with both barrels. It’s already warned lawmakers that the
issue will be the only thing it judges on its legislative scorecard
- - and this is an election year.
|