Insider Follow Up:
Suddenly, A Lot Of Interest In Mysterious
Grady Audit
By Dick Pettys
InsiderAdvantage Georgia
(8/29/07) Suddenly, a whole bunch of people under the Gold Dome
are interested in an audit - said to have been conducted two years
ago and kept secret since - of compliance with the contract between
troubled Grady Hospital and Emory Medical School, which - with Morehouse
- supplies all of the public hospital’s doctors.
After the audit’s existence became known through a letter
circulated at the Capitol earlier this week, Sen. David Shafer was
first to announce he would seek a copy under the Georgia Open Records
Act. Then a spokeswoman said that Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle was looking
forward to the results of Shafer’s request, and then the chairman
of a special House study committee said she, too, wanted to see
the audit.
What’s in it? Opinions differ.
The man who wrote the letter - former Grady Trustee William Loughrey
- put it this way: “The report to the board found numerous
problems with compliance with the contract, particularly with the
requisite record keeping by Emory to document that their employees
were providing the services for which Emory was being paid under
the contract.”
Loughrey’s letter came to light just in advance of the first
hearing of the House study committee on Grady. It happened that
one of the first witnesses before the committee when it met on Tuesday
was Dr. Thomas J. Lawley, dean of the Emory School of Medicine and
he was asked about the audit.
Lawley confirmed there was such a report but said Emory never got
a copy of it. In addition, he said the report pointed a finger at
Grady - not at Emory.
"Our understanding of it is, the medical schools were found
to be in complete compliance with the contract and Grady was found
not to be. That's my understanding of that report. We were never
given an official version of it. At least I've not seen a final
copy of it, but that's my understanding. I think that it would be
totally appropriate to make that public."
Told that the allegation was completely the opposite, he said,
"I disagree with that to the best of my knowledge."
There was a lot more in Loughrey’s letter.
For example, he suggested Emory was steering paying customers away
from publicly-owned Grady and toward its own privately-owned hospitals,
and was failing to emphasize programs at Grady - cardiology and
orthopedics, for example - that might turn a profit.
“To my knowledge, we surely haven’t been under-funding
this at all ... Why would we systematically transfer paying patients
out of a hospital that owes us $45 million? We would like to be
paid,” the Emory dean said.
As for steering paying patients to its own hospitals, he used the
example of someone seeking treatment for an elective orthopedic
procedure.
Trauma cases, which often require orthopedic treatment, always
get first priority at Grady, he said, and elective surgery must
wait its turn. Rather than being "steered" to, say, Crawford
Long, he said, "I think it is more likely that they would send
themselves. Patients have the ability to go wherever they like..."
Nevertheless, the letter seems to have created a bit of a stir.
Where it goes from here remains to be seen.
Rep. Ben Harbin, R-Evans, a member of the study committee as well
as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, was asked during
a break in Tuesday's hearing whether he was concerned by the charges
in the letter.
"I think it's brought up some good questions for us to ask
... Does that audit exist? Has it been kept secret? It's just information
that we need to know. If the letter is truly factual, there will
be a lot of concerns ... but right now I think it's just allowed
us to ask the right questions and try to look in the right direction
so we can hopefully fix this problem."
The letter was only one aspect of Tuesday’s hearing, which
opened with presentations by Lawley and by Dean Eve Higginbotham
of Morehouse.
At the morning session, committee members seemed to focus on a
couple of issues. One was on a rotational system in which specific
Emory and Morehouse doctors are only at the hospital certain days
of the week. Chairman Sharon Cooper R-Marietta, said she’d
heard that meant that patients would have to spend unnecessary and
expensive days in the hospital waiting for their particular doctor
to rotate back in.
Both deans said they were working towards a more seamless blending
of services.
Another issue: Grady pays the liability insurance premiums of Emory
doctors for the portion of the time they are at Grady. Is that an
expense that could be covered some other way, Emory’s Lawley
was asked.
He argued that’s a trade-off for the expense Grady is spared
in recruiting qualified doctors for the hospital.
|